Keeping Your Ears to the Ground
A Journalist's Guide to Citizen Participation in the News:
A Primer on Community Journalism
Tamara L. Gillis, Ed. D.
and
Robert C. Moore, Ed. D.
Keeping Your Ears to the Ground
A JournalistÕs Guide to Citizen Participation in the News: A Primer on Community Journalism
Tamara L. Gillis, Ed. D.
and
Robert C. Moore, Ed. D.
Elizabethtown College, PA, USA
The Polytechnic of Namibia
Published by The Polytechnic
of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
Department of Media Technology
Private Bag 13388
Windhoek, Namibia
The Department of Media
Technology currently offers a National Diploma in Journalism and Communication
Technology. Though a partnership
with the Department of Communications at Elizabethtown College and the
Netherlands Institute for Southern Africa (NIZA), the program is engaged in
both the instruction of civic/community journalism and its application in the
public sector.
Copyright © 2003 by Tamara L.
Gillis and Robert C. Moore
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or
retrieval system, without permission.
Printed in the Republic of
Namibia
Table of Contents
About the Authors iii
About This Guide v
Chapter 1: Developmental Communication and Civic/Community Journalism 1
Making the Connection Between Developmental Communication and Civic/Community Journalism 1
Thinking of Journalism in a New Way 3
What is in a Name? 3
Of Special Note 6
Additional Resources 6
Chapter 2: Public Listening and the Practice of Community Journalism 9
Key Concepts of Community Journalism 9
Public Listening 10
There are Various Layers of ÒPublic:Ó Tapping into These Layers 11
Identifying What is Important to the Community 13
Limitations of the Media 15
Questions to Consider 15
Assignment 15
Additional Resources 16
Chapter 3: Public judgment and the Practice of Community Journalism 17
What are Some of the Characteristics of the Relationships Between Journalists, the Community, and the Media in General? 17
Public Judgment 18
Questions to Consider 20
Assignment 20
Additional Resources 20
Chapter 4: How Can Journalists Engaged in Community Journalism Help Citizen Act? 23
Review of Public judgment 23
Finding Solutions: Consensus 24
Helping Citizens Act 25
Questions to Consider 25
Assignment 26
Additional Resources 26
Chapter 5: The Five Layers of Civic Life, Broadcasting, and the Practice of Community Journalism 27
Review of the Five Layers of Civic Life 27
A Community Journalism Model for Broadcasting 28
Commitment 28
Research 29
Substance 29
Questions for Review 30
Assignment 30
Additional Resources 30
Chapter 6: Putting All of This into Practice: The Community Journalism Project 31
A Few Final Comments 31
The Project 32
APPENDICES 33
Civic & Community Journalism Bibliography 35
Civic Journalism and Community Empowerment Organizations and Resources—Online Links 47
Civic Organizations (From the Battlefield School District) 59
Civic Journalism Online Resources (From the Texas A & M University) 61
The WWW Virtual Library: International Affairs Resources (Maintained at Elizabethtown College, Pennsylvania, USA) 63
Journalism Organizations and Related Sites (From the University of MD) 65
About the Authors
Ed. D.,
Higher Education Administration, University of Pittsburgh; M.S., Communications
Studies, Shippensburg (PA) University; B.A., English, Shippensburg (PA)
University. Dr. Tamara Gillis is associate professor of communications and
chair of the department at Elizabethtown College. In addition, she has held the position of director of student publications, advising student media (The Etownian and the Conestogan yearbook) and teaches journalism, publication design, and public relations courses. Her research interests include civic journalism, student culture, change management, public relations officers in organization structures, public art as communication, and a "great books" approach to teaching public relations. Dr. Gillis' email address is: gillistl at etown dot edu
Dr. Robert C. Moore
Ed. D.,
Higher Education Curriculum and Instruction and Communications Technology, West
Virginia University; M.S., Mass Communications and Educational Media, Clarion
(PA) University; B.S., Education - English, Speech and Communications, Edinboro
(PA) University. Dr. Robert Moore is professor of communications and former
chair of the department at Elizabethtown College. He teaches communications seminar, media and society, introduction to media production, international communications, and organizational training. His research interests include international communications, civic journalism, freedom of the press, communication administration and curriculum development. Dr. Moore's email address is: moorerc at etown dot edu
About This Guide
This
guide is designed to accompany an advanced journalism course in the study of
current journalistic initiatives.
The guide emphasizes the important connection between communities and
their media -- print and broadcast and the resultant imperative for journalists
to serve the citizenry.
Using
an investigative approach, coupled with case study analyses,
participants/students will develop an understanding and appreciation for
civic/community journalism, its practices, its application and development, and
the implications for it in global communications.
The
purpose of this guide is to encourage journalists to learn, understand, and
apply the basic values and principles of traditional journalism in light of new
democracies and community empowerment found within the tenets of
civic/community journalism.
Objectives
The
course and study guide will help the journalist recognize and value the
practice of journalism as an agent of social change and empowerment.
It will
help the journalist become aware of the resources and develop the skills to
apply civic/community journalism practices in their daily work as a journalist.
The
journalist will adopt a philosophy for developing journalism initiatives in
service to the community and its members.
When
discussing the civic journalism model presented here, the authors will use the
term community journalism. It
should be understood that in this context, the word community could be
interchanged with civic or public.
Many of the readings or resources used to support this guide, in fact,
use civic or public journalism rather than the term community journalism.
A
further distinction needs to also be made. Community journalism, as defined here, is not
interchangeable with the term community media. In this regard, community media is referred to as a media
that has its focus, and perhaps its geographic location and distribution,
limited to a very defined local group of people or target area. It is also often referred to as a media
that is located in a local community.
Community journalism is a way of doing journalism, of serving the
people, of involving the people in the issues that are important in their
community.
Developmental Communication and
Civic/Community Journalism
Charity,
A. (1995). Doing Public
Journalism. New York: The Guilford Press. CHAPTER 1.
MAKING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN DEVELOPMENTAL COMMUNICATION AND CIVIC/COMMUNITY JOURNALISM
NWICO,
the New World Information and Communications Order, the movement by UNESCO in
the 1970's, can be seen as a foundation, a basis, for the current trend, the
current emphasis, among journalists known as civic, public, or community
journalism.
The
goals of developmental communication fit nicely into the movement of community
journalism or civic journalism.
To
briefly define developmental communication, it was the belief that the
instruments of media (radio, television, newspapers) could be used by the
central government of a country to help build a nation. The whole idea behind
UNESCO and NWICO is that developing countries could build themselves up using
the media. This was both a very important concept and a very misunderstood
concept. That is, governments, not only the colonial governments but also the
current governments of independent and developing countries, interpreted the
UNESCO position to mean that they could take control of the media, and that
they would use their government authority to tell the media what to do. The purpose was then to tell the media
what was important to tell the people.
This,
in a sense, disenfranchised the people and the media, it took away some of
their freedoms because it was essentially the government telling the citizens
what was important to them. What must be remembered in terms of nation
building, in terms of development communication, is that it occurs as the
result of people, not of government.
No matter how much the government tells the media to develop people, if
people don't want to develop, they don't.
If people don't develop, nations don't develop. This is where both the
theory of development communication and the practice of development
communication collided. Instead of media often being used to support a
government agenda, they should be used to support the people's agendas, to
support what is important to them. This, by the way, is not different from what
UNESCO in the early 1970's was saying; it was just different in terms of
practice.
Illiteracy,
health, poverty, education and even political awareness are all elements of
nation building, of people building, and while developing countries'
governments acknowledge that these things are important, it was probably their
control that caused the lack of media being supportive of initiatives in developmental
communication. So, community journalism is sometimes interpreted as a return to
the goals of developmental communication. It is an effort to, what has been
called, "democratize the media."
When
the term democratization of the media is invoked, the idea expressed is not
about making the media democratic, not about making it American, not about
making it free. Democratizing the media is all about making it responsive to
the people. When the media is democratized, it is media whose mission is one that
serves the people.
The
basis of this approach comes directly from the UNESCO Commission. According to
the UNESCO report on the New World Information and Communications Order about
democratization of the media, "It is a matter of human rights, the right
to communicate is an extension of the advances toward liberty and democracy.
Democratizing the media cannot be simply additional facilities. It means broader
access to the media by the general public,
and the interchange of information
between people without the dominance of any one person or one group."
When
the media is democratized, it means, in practice, that it serves the people and
that the people use the media to get the information that they are interested
in so that they can live their daily lives in an improved way. In order for
that to happen, the people must participate in determining the focus of the
media. There is not necessarily a hierarchy in this process. Journalists are
not above the people in this regard.
In fact, journalists are servants to the people and partners with the
people. All people are considered equal and central to the purpose of the
media. Urban residents are simply
one of the groups of people that are involved in the consultative process with
the media. They are not to be elite, not to have undue influence. But, in order to do its job properly,
the media may have to go far outside of urban centers to reach all of the
constituencies that they are to serve. Reporters must cover rural and remote
areas as well know how the people feel and to share information that is
important with them. It is the use of information as a self help, as personal
growth, and to achieve greater information and education for everyone that is
essential to developmental communication and the common goals of community
journalism. These are very laudable goals and are important to
self-determination, self-improvement, and to nation building. These are the
goals that journalists should strive for in their daily work.
In
civic/community journalism, relationships must be forged between the media and
the citizens as equal participants in this entire process. That is actually a
very old concept and the basis on which journalism was established hundreds of
years ago. That is where
journalism began and civic/community journalism is a return to journalism's
roots.
There
is a new way of thinking about journalism, a new way for each journalist to do
his or her job. When a journalist
goes into the field and begins exploring stories, the focus is to be less from
the mouthpieces of business, industry and government and more in collaboration
with the people. That's easily said but more difficult to do. Another component of this new way of
thinking is in the newsroom--in editorial meetings. As a story lead develops,
the journalist must consider how it impacts the people from all levels of the
community. Civic/community journalism requires a more people-centered approach
to developing stories and to the stories suggested for the media.
If
journalists are more people-centered in their writing, more people-centered in
their reporting, then the newspaper or broadcast station, regardless of who
owns it, will become more valuable to the people. The goal of civic/community
journalism is to make the media valuable to the people, because journalists are
telling and sharing with them the things that are important to them.
There
are three terms that are used, often interchangeably, to represent this new
journalism concept: public journalism, civic journalism, and community
journalism. All three terms have, as a common basis, the idea of the journalist
as a member of the community gathering new stories for the civic good ... for
the public goodÉfor the community.
A journalistÕs
focus is on the community and how as a journalist, reporter, broadcaster, they
can best serve the people. This is
best done when the journalist is a member of the community by being one of the
citizens, not as an elitist member of the media or society.
These
three terms represent the same idea--that collaboration between the citizens of
the community and the media should all work together to solve problems or come
up with ideas that might be solutions to problems that face the community and
have a focus on self-improvement.
The
term civic journalism began with American newspapers in the Nineties as they
began to revisit the roots of the worthy profession. But today, journalists are
involved in cases of civic journalism that include collaboration of the
different community media - television, radio and the local newspaper. They work together to help the
community deal with issues, or just bringing these issues to light, so that the
people in the community can begin to discuss solutions and opportunities to
make their lives and communities better.
In
fact, civic journalism is happening around the world. Case studies have
documented projects related to civic improvement and public deliberation (some
with the participation of the media) in:
Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Guatemala, Hungary, Lebanon, Poland,
Romania, Russia, South Africa, Swaziland, and Tajikistan.
Civic
journalism can be described using a simple three-phase process as written about
by many of the authors in this movement in civic/community journalism. Those
three phases include: consciousness raising, working through the issue with the
community, and then a phase of issue resolution. While the resolution phase may
sound like a final stage, it is just the beginning of actually solving problems
and getting the community involved in solving their own problems or challenges.
In the
consciousness-raising phase, the media finds out what issues are of concern in
the community. To do that, the media must go out and become part of the community.
The media reconnect themselves and talk to people, not just opinion leaders in
the community. The media need to learn from the citizens. They need to learn:
what the people think is going on in their community; what would the people
like to know more about; and, how do the citizens think they can make a
difference and improve their lives. In the first phase, the journalist is on
fact-finding mission to learn about the community. In the process, news stories
may be written or produced about various aspects of the information
uncovered. However, during this
phase, reporters are conducting research on their community for the purpose of
a much more long-range investigation.
In the
second phase of Òworking through problems or issues,Ó the community has now
identified, for the journalist, the issues, an agenda or a public agenda, with
the emphasis on "public."
The citizens have given their input to the media and enlightened them on
what they think is important in their community. From these issues, the media
can begin to construct news stories that highlight the peoples' point of view
of what's happening, or perhaps hold meetings to find out what the community
would like to know more about, how they'd like to see issues addressed, collect
ideas, discuss ideas, bring government into the discussions, find out a variety
of ideas are and how they fit into the picture. This activity leads to the
third phase of civic/community journalism, resolution.
The
plans and activities in phase two may lead to news coverage (print or
broadcast) like a series of articles in the newspaper, or a series of segments
on a broadcast news program, or a community project that addresses the original
issue to alleviate the problem.
But, the civic/community journalistÕs responsibility does not stop
there.
Because
civic/community journalism is a process, the final phase, the resolution phase,
leads back to the beginning of the process. In the resolution phase, news
stories and projects may be completed. This may result in a resolution to the
issue originally identified for the civic/community journalism project. But
other issues may have come to the surface during the reporter's work with the
community. It is at this time that these new issues are taken back to the first
phase and worked through the process, again, with the community, in an attempt
to solve these new issues.
Problems
aren't always solved, and sometimes when they are solved, new problems come to
light. So, the cycle continues. As
the media becomes more aware of issues, they try to help people find solutions
to the issues, and with the citizens, continue to focus on improvement and
resolution of the issues. Because it's the peopleÕs solutions, not the media's
solutions, the media simply continues to be that voice in the community, that
forum in the community, where the public feel that they are the center, they
are the most important part of the community.
As
mentioned previously, this is the bridge between developmental communications
and civic/community journalism. This
is the return to what journalism was all about when journalists first started
writing in newspapers--to keep their communities informed of issues affecting
their survival. Early newspapers developed for local citizens to have a voice
in public issues, for citizens to know what was going on in their community,
and for citizens to know how to participate in their community. Civic
journalism, public journalism, and community journalism is a movement with the
people leading the media, telling the media what is important to them, and
directing how the media can provide that forum for the citizens to engage in
problem solving.
In the
United States and other countries, civic journalism projects have addressed
such issues as elections, crime prevention, youth programs, AIDS, health care,
and education. These topics are of
universal importance and many of the international projects have focused on the
same topics. While much of the
published support materials in the field use American projects as examples, the
tactics employed and the lessons learned will be able to be applied throughout
the world.
Civic/community
journalism is not a movement among scholars. It is not a movement among
lecturers at polytechnics and universities, it is not teaching new journalists
or new students how to serve people better. In fact, civic/community journalism
is a movement of practicing journalists to do their job better and to make the
impact of the media for meaningful.
Arthur Charity, author of Doing Public Journalism, became most noted for his efforts in this area when he
was an editor at a newspaper in Ottawa, Canada. Civic journalism has its roots,
its growth, in a non-American movement. Today, it is still not solely American.
How do the journalists feel about this new way of approaching journalism?
Arthur Charity notes in his book a positive change for reporters in the
performance of their jobs. They have reconnected with their local communities
and improved their writing and focus skills as journalists.
The Pew
Foundation for Civic Journalism has documented the shift in newsroom attitudes
using this process. An enormous amount of reading material is available from
the organization and from their website: www.pewcenter.org
Your lecturer has copies of many of the articles and publications. See the extensive bibliography at the
end of this guide (items that are in bold are available for loan from the
lecturer.)
Reporters from newspapers and broa